![]() |
Selecting sellers is the process of choosing one or more sellers –who are both qualified- and negotiating viable contracts. |
![]() |
This process relies on the Request Seller Responses process, which obtains necessary information so that appropriate sellers can be chosen. |
![]() |
It involves evaluating proposals or bids, choosing the best one, negotiating the contracting and awarding the contract. |
![]() |
Sellers are often chosen based on a list of weighted requirements separated into technical and commercial sections with each evaluated separately. |
![]() |
Sometimes management sections are required as part of the proposal and also have to be evaluated. |
![]() |
Figure 27.1 provides a sample proposal evaluation sheet that the project team might use to create a short list of the best proposals. |


![]() |
Inputs |
![]() |
Organizational Process Assets | |
![]() |
Procurement Management Plan | |
![]() |
Evaluation Criteria. | |
![]() |
Procurement Document Package | |
![]() |
Proposals |
![]() |
Qualified Sellers List | |
![]() |
Project Management Plan | |
![]() |
Risk register | |
![]() |
Risk-related contractual agreements |
![]() |
Tools and Techniques |
![]() |
Weighting systems: this method is used to quantify qualitative data to minimize the effect of personal prejudice on the seller selection. |
![]() |
Developing a weighting system often follows the following procedure: |
![]() |
Identifying of all the non-monetary factors that are relevant to the project, | |
![]() |
Allocating numerical weights to each of these factors to reflect their relative importance, | |
![]() |
Scoring the prospective sellers on each factor (criterion), | |
![]() |
Multiplying the weight by the scoring and totaling the resultant sellers to compute an overall score. |
![]() |
The result is a single weighted score for each option, which may be used to indicate and compare the overall performance of the options in non-monetary terms. Figure 27.2 illustrates a sample weighting matrix. |

![]() |
Independent estimates: also referred to as a "should-cost" estimate which the procuring organization can either prepare on its own or have an independent estimate of the costs as a check on proposed pricing. |
![]() |
It should be noted that significant differences from these cost estimates can be a sign of: |
![]() |
Inadequate contract statement of work that the prospective seller either failed to respond to it fully or, | |||
![]() |
Changed marketplace. |
![]() |
Screening system: this is a system establishing minimum requirements of performance for the project used basically to create a ranking for sellers from best to worst. |
![]() |
The screening system that can employ a weighting system and independent estimates. |
![]() |
Contract negotiation: this tool is used to clarify the structure and the requirements of the contract on order to reach a mutual agreement prior to signing the contract. |
![]() |
Objectives of Negotiation: |
![]() |
Obtain a fair and reasonable price | |||
![]() |
Develop a good relationship with the seller (a win-win situation) | |||
![]() |
Subjects covered within the negotiations include the following: |
![]() |
Responsibilities and authorities | |||
![]() |
Applicable terms and law | |||
![]() |
Technical and business management approaches | |||
![]() |
Proprietary rights | |||
![]() |
Contract financing | |||
![]() |
Technical solution, | |||
![]() |
Overall schedule payments and price. |
![]() |
For complex procurement items contract negotiation can be independent process with inputs (e.g. an issues or open items list) and outputs (e.g. documented decisions) of its own; |
![]() |
Whereas For simple procurement items, the terms and conditions of the contract can be non-negotiable and only need to be accepted by the seller. |
![]() |
Seller Rating System: Seller rating systems are developed by many organizations and use information such as the seller's past performance, quality ratings, delivery performance and contractual compliance in order to evaluate sellers. | |
![]() |
Typically this tool is used with the screening system to select sellers. |
![]() |
Proposal evaluation techniques: these are an already established techniques developed form expert judgment and some form of evaluation criteria; |
![]() |
by other words the criteria for selecting the seller should be defined beforehand, and these criteria may already be an organizational process asset. |
![]() |
It involves an evaluation committee comparing seller proposals against pre-defined criteria. | |
![]() |
Many different techniques can be used to rate and score proposals and can involve both objective and subjective components. | |
![]() |
Proposal evaluation techniques also can employ a screening system and use data from a seller rating system. | |
![]() |
Expert Judgment |
![]() |
Outputs |
![]() |
Selected sellers: those are sellers who have been judged to be in a competitive range based upon the outcome of the proposal or bid evaluation, and who have negotiated a draft contract, which will be the actual contract when an award is made. | |
![]() |
Contract: this is the document connecting the buyer to the seller and is awarded to each selected seller. |
![]() |
A contract is a mutually binding legal agreement that obligates the seller to provide the specified products or services and obligates the buyer to pay the seller. | |
![]() |
Contract management plan: this is a document describing by whom and how the contract will be administered with respect to changes and confirmations. | |
![]() |
The plan covers the contract administration activities throughout the life of the contact. | |
![]() |
Each contract management plan is a subset of the project management plan. | |
![]() |
Resource availability: with respect to quantity and availability. | |
![]() |
Procurement management plan updates | |
![]() |
Requested changes |