![]() |
A quantitative risk analysis is a further analysis of the highest risk priorities; |
![]() |
however a quantitative rating is assigned to develop a probabilistic analysis of the project. |
![]() |
In general quantitative risk analysis involves the following processes: |
![]() |
Assessing the probability of achieving specific project objectives. | |
![]() |
Creating realistic cost, schedule and scope targets. |
![]() |
Inputs |
![]() |
Risk register. | |
![]() |
Risk management plan. | |
![]() |
Schedule management plan. | |
![]() |
Cost management plan. | |
![]() |
Organizational process assets. |
![]() |
Tools and Techniques |
![]() |
Expert judgment | |
![]() |
Data gathering & representation techniques | |
![]() |
Interviewing: such interviews are carried out to gather an optimistic (low), pessimistic (high), and most likely scenarios. | |
![]() |
Probability distributions: these are a mathematical representation of the probability of risk events occurring (uncertain events), such as uncertainty in values of tasks durations or cost of project components. |
![]() |
These probability distributions typically aid in decision-making by considering the real probability of risk events occurring and using this determine the best way to approach each risk. |
![]() |
Quantitative risk analysis & modeling techniques- commonly used for event-oriented as well as project-oriented analysis. Common quantitative risk analysis & modeling techniques include : |
![]() |
Sensitivity analysis: this analysis is used to determine which risks have the greatest potential impact on the project. |
![]() |
This is done through examining the effect of the uncertainty of each project element to a specific project objective, when all other uncertain elements are held at their baseline values. |
![]() |
Modeling and Simulation: this is a project simulation which computes the effect of specific uncertainties of the project into their potential impact on project objectives. | ||
![]() |
Decision Tree Analysis: this is a flow diagram usually structured where each node (represented by a rectangle) describes the risk aspect and its cost. |
![]() |
Using a decision tree aid in evaluating implications associated with each possible scenario and hence a more informed project risk management decision. |
![]() |
For instance, if an organization has been using a software for a while and it is not fulfilling the organization's needs anymore and the dominant stakeholders are split into three groups in terms of software usage; where group I support staying with the legacy software costing $100,000 (maintenance cost), group II support buying a new software costing $800,000 and group III support developing a new software in-house costing $400,000. |
![]() |
Using the decision tree in this case will help in point out the possible negative risks and exploring all possibilities and consequences for each given option (quantifying decisions). |
![]() |
Figure 24.2 highlights the decision tree analysis for this example illustrating the |

![]() |
The Buy the New Software and Build the New Software options will lead to either a successful deployment or an unsuccessful one. |
![]() |
If the deployment is successful then the impact is zero. |
![]() |
However, if the deployment is unsuccessful, then the risk will materialize and the impact is $2 million. |
![]() |
The Stay with the Legacy Software option will lead to only one impact, which is $2 million, since the currently used software is not meeting the recent nor the future needs of the company in case of business growth. |

![]() |
Expected Monetary Value analysis (EMV): this is a statistical concept that calculates the average outcome when the future includes uncertain events, whether opportunities or risks. |
![]() |
This is done by multiplying the probability of the risk with the impact. |
![]() |
By doing this. |
![]() |
For instance, based on the previous example the Expected Monetary Value will be calculated as follows: |
![]() |
Staying with the legacy software: $ 2,000,000 * 1 = $ 2,000,000 | ||
![]() |
Buy the new software: $ 2,000,000 * 0. 5 = $ 1,000,000 | ||
![]() |
Build the new software: $ 2,000,000 * 0.3 = $ 600,000 | ||
![]() |
Now, add the setup costs to each Expected Monetary Value: | ||
![]() |
Staying with the legacy software: $ 2,000,000 + $ 100,000 = $ 2,100,000 | ||
![]() |
Buy the new software: $ 1,000,000 + $ 800,000 = $ 1,800,000 | ||
![]() |
Build the new software: $ 600,000 + $ 400,000 = $ 1,000,000 |
![]() |
Outputs |
![]() |
Risk register updates: this is an expansion of the initially generated an updated one, since it includes the following: | |
![]() |
Probabilistic analysis of the project | |
![]() |
Probability of achieving cost and time objectives |
![]() |
Prioritized list of quantified risk | |
![]() |
Trends in quantitative risk analysis results |