4.2 Argumentative approach

There are also a number of other research approaches used in research, including the so-called Argumentative approach. What is meant by Argumentative approach? Argument: is a kind of dialogue between two parties with a kind of lengthy, and a directly debate between the researchers, this approach is from the philosophers ages, the Greeks, it spread in most of the science academies and this approach is found in many scientific books such as the debate at sophists, This kind of debate is a discussion and dialogue between two parties chatting dialogue around a case, through this discussion and dialogue, the group which have a stronger reasoning than the other is determined the correct, they present the arguments that prove their points of views, and then to this views can be believed.

Argumentation includes debate and negotiation which are concerned with reaching mutually acceptable conclusions.

The key components of argumentation: Understanding and identifying the arguments, the goals of the participants in the different types of dialogue. Identifying the premises from which conclusions are derived. Establishing the proof, determining who made the initial claim and is thus responsible for providing evidence, why his position merits acceptance.

For the one, carrying the "burden of proof", the advocate, to marshal evidence for his position in order to convince or force the opponent's acceptance. The approach by which this is accomplished is producing valid, sound, and cogent arguments, devoid of weaknesses, and not easily attacked.

4.2 Argumentative approach

In a debate, fulfillment of the burden of proof creates a burden of rejoinder. One must try to identify faulty reasoning in the opponent's argument, to attack the reasons/premises of the argument, to provide counterexamples if possible, to identify any logical fallacies, and to show why a valid conclusion cannot be derived from the reasons provided for his argument.