4.1 The Deduction and Extraction Approach

We mentioned before that the integration between the inductive approach and the deductive approach in a single way, called the deductive inductive approach, or what we call the scientific method.

Through the review of approaches that have been used over the ages, we find inductive approach. There is a similarity between the case study and the induction which means an understanding of the steps that lead to the measurement through the induction. Premises, data collection, and collection of different phenomena on the problem can be done, then the measurement is based upon those premises that have been collected, and generalizing the results. So, this measurement is considered an evidential and confirmed work through a full induction i.e., the complete awareness of the knowledge aspects, when knowledge of parts of these molecules, we reach full knowledge of that phenomenon, because it was familiar with all aspects of that problem, because all of the sides related to that problem were awareness, and at the awareness by all of the sides or the coverage of all sides related to that problem.

We can then manage the mind well for the use of the measurement. The measurement takes place here through the tangible knowledge or the perception of the scientist; through it we can reach that knowledge.

And hence it becomes clear that Aristotle treated the measurement in the same way of treating induction through the premises we reach the result, and consequently the weakness in premises affects the outcomes, and weaknesses of induction affects the measurement, so, the measurement becomes wrong. We find that the full induction as to Aristotle is total premises to reach a total result, and then the result is produced from premises, we find that the induction is a quality for the measurement.

4.1 The Deduction and Extraction Approach

Limits in these premises, or in the process of induction or inductive approach is not specific to certain members, but they are different types because it can not be done to revive the entire members of the human or inventory of the people in the past and present, so that we can define him, and extrapolate information associated to him.

Aristotle defines specific types of induction, must be followed until reaching a complete induction, depending on a very important aspect- the premises- which through we reach what is called the real demonstration.

We use the inductive approach to identify the special premises in scientific approaches. The induction varies from one problem to another, but it worth mentioning that the researcher has to adopt a good approach in terms of collecting data or all premises. These premises are not inevitable for him, but he depends on that premises are just probability to reach a conclusion which may also a probable result.

In the case of discovering that the situation is negative, we reject these results, so we have to realize that the use of inductive approach was used from ancient Greek philosophers' era, which follow the scientific approach in the search, one of the scientific approaches for research, which is tracing the issue and its problems.

Induction is done in the perceived things, it is recognized that the inductive approach offers a number of premises that can be inducted, and the correct premises is taken the basis in that approach, that information has a direct impact in the minds and souls, and the main factor that check the validity of those premises is that a researcher is able to reach good results.

4.1 The Deduction and Extraction Approach

And then we use induction, because the experiment is not available in all science, we can not impose all the sciences upon the experiment, so there is some science needs to inductive approach, for example, the historian who examines the events of the past can not do a scientific experiment of them, and then he needs to induct the past events to reach the result through the performed research.

Deduction is an approach to proof theory that attempts to provide a formal model of logical reasoning as it "naturally" occurs. Deductive approach involves beginning with a general concept or given rule and moving on to a more specific conclusion. Conducting a science experiment is just like the mysteries presented Clues are presented concerning the conclusion and using the information given as well as previous knowledge, you can solve the mystery!

Deductive is the process of reaching a conclusion that is guaranteed to follow. The conclusion must be based only on the evidence previously provided; it cannot contain new information about the subject matter. Deductive reasoning was first described by the ancient Greek philosophers such as Aristotle, "drawing conclusions by applying rules or principles; logically moving from a general rule or principle to a specific solution". To use the deductive approach, here is what you need to do:

You have to start somewhere, and you start with undefined terms. You pick undefined terms to be very common and self-evident. Once you have agreed on some undefined terms, you can use them to create definitions. Next, you need to pick some simple, obviously true statements about the undefined terms and definitions. These statements are called axioms or postulates.

4.1 The Deduction and Extraction Approach

You can combine your axioms, definitions, and undefined terms with the rules of logic to prove that other statements must be true. These statements are called theorems. Once a theorem is proven, you can use it, along with other proven theorems, axioms, definitions, and undefined terms to prove other theorems.

Using the deductive approach, you start with a few true statements (the axioms) and use them to prove dozens, hundreds, thousands, or millions of other statements (the theorems).

We must point out that the difference between the related approach, inductive approach and the deductive approach does not negate the unity of science or eliminate the power of scientific research, the power of scientific research in spite of the multiplicity and variety but they all share in one essential thing: accuracy, using of evidence, logical evidence, studying books and the opinions of others, to benefit from the former in the research, he can review and confirm the results of research, to benefit the community.