
![]() |
it is a familiar source of all of us, amongst the most used sources. We can reach many answers to our |
| questions by using our experiences. |
![]() |
Despite the benefits of the experience, it has its shortage as a source of truth. If a person affected with |
| specific event depending on his personality. Many individuals get different experiences from the same |
| situation .The person in need to know things can't be learned by the experience. |
![]() |
means those the persons who have an experience in the problem which we study, such as the experts |
![]() |
There are aspects of shortage in the people of confidence as a source for knowledge. We sometimes |
| find contradiction among the people in some issues. |
![]() |
The idea of induction is old not new, it is outdated since Aristotle, who adopted the idea, induction |
| means to trace the idea to come to the conclusion, through a comprehensive survey of that idea... |
| ...and compare the other approaches that are used in the search, we find that the induction which |
| Aristotle adopted is based on the generalization, or we find some particles in all, when these particles |
| are found, there can be here generalization in judgment, and we can use these particles or some and |
| generalize on all, we find that it moves from particle to another through it. We find Aristotle is the first on |
| drawing an approach to reach the correct knowledge; we can trust it on the basis of the actual viewing |
| "Bacon" It is a diverse, there are a full induction, and incomplete induction. |
![]() |
The Greek philosophers were the first who put an organized way to getting the knowledge, Aristotle and |
| his companies were the first who used the deductive approach that can be described that it is the |
| operation in which the person moves from general to particular, with the use of specific bases of the |
| logic. It is a way to organize the information for reaching conclusions. It's possible to achieve that by the |
| use of the dialectical logic. The dialectical problem consists of a group of phrases have a relationship |
| among them. The final phrase called the result. |
![]() |
In the deductive approach if the premises were right, the result is the necessarily right. The deductive |
| approach enables us to organize the issues in types that give decisive demonstration of the... |
| ...validity of the result. |
![]() |
But the deductive approach has its aspects of shortage the person must start with right premises until |
| reaches the right result, and the result can't exceeds the premises content. Whereas the deduction of the |
| results is necessarily a kind of the redundancy in the present knowledge in the past, it's not possible to |
| make the scientific investigation with the use of the deductive approach only, because of the difficulty in |
| showing the complete truth to many of the phrases that treat scientific phenomena. The deductive |
| approach is useful in the process of search, despite his aspects of shortage. |
![]() |
When we compare the scientific method with other sources of knowledge, such the experience or the |
| people of confidence or the inductive approach or the deductive approach, we find that the scientific |
| method is the most effective and stable. |
![]() |
Also the inductive approach and the deductive approach have a limited value, if they used individually. |
| The researchers quickly learned to achieve the integration between the inductive approach and the |
| deductive approach in a single way, called the deductive inductive approach, or what we call the |
| scientific method. |