![]() |
Physical Security |
![]() |
Any communication network (if not wireless) will need cables to connect the different nodes that make up the network. | |
![]() |
These cables can be a source of information gathering for intruders as they can interfere with the data that is being passed through the cables through the practice of eavesdropping, wiretapping and bugging. | |
![]() |
Screening the cables is a solution for these security threats as it acts as a barrier against un-wanted interference. | |
![]() |
By screening cables, the data cable is protected by several insulated conductors that are covered by a plastic jacket. | |
![]() |
These insulated conductors act as a Faraday Cage that reduces the level of interference that could affect the data cable. | |
![]() |
A much securer option (over copper data cables) is the use of fibre optic. Fibre optic, as well as being a much faster transmitter of data than copper cables, the threat of interference is virtually zero as fibre optic acts as a vacuum between the outside world and the data that is being transmitted through it. |
![]() |
Processes |
![]() |
Applying processes such as cryptography, firewalls, filters and gateways is a fundamental part of networks and telecommunication security. | |
![]() |
The process of cryptography can be further broken down into link encryption and end to end encryption. | |
![]() |
A network that utilizes link encryption (see Figure 15.1) has an encryption and decryption device at every stage/link (connectors, routers etc) of the network where the information being passed is encrypted and decrypted. | |
![]() |
In addition to the information being encrypted and decrypted, the headers, addresses and routing data are also encrypted and decrypted at every link. | |
![]() |
The advantage of using link encryption is that all data (information plus the packet header, addresses and routing data) are encrypted. | |
![]() |
However, due to encryption and decryption occurring at every link in the network, the encryption key management is more complex than end to end encryption. |

![]() |
On the other hand, end to end encryption only involves the processes of encryption and decryption at the ’ends’ of the network (see Figure 15.2). | |
![]() |
The information is encrypted when it is sent from the sender and only decrypted when it is reached its destination. | |
![]() |
Unlike link encryption, headers, addresses and routing data are not encrypted; the different links in the network just read these and pass them on to the next link until the encrypted data reaches its destination. |
![]() |
Key management is less complex than in link encryption. | |
![]() |
However, a disadvantage of end to end encryption is the vulnerability to traffic analysis as the packet header is not encrypted. |
