![]() |
There are two generic models of organizational design: |
![]() |
It is a rigid and tightly controlled structure characterized by high specialized, rigid departmentalization, narrow spans of control, high formalization, a limited information network and little participation in decision-making by lower-level employees. |
![]() |
It is highly flexible which means jobs can change rapidly as needs require. |
![]() |
Employees require minimum formal rules and little direct supervision. |
![]() |
It may have specialized jobs but those jobs are not standardized. |
![]() |
The appropriate structure depends on four contingency variables: |
![]() |
Strategy. |
![]() |
Current strategy frameworks tend to focus on three dimensions: |
1. |
Innovation: This reflects the organization's pursuit of meaningful and unique innovations. |
2. |
Cost Minimization: This reflects an organization's pursuit of tightly controlled costs. |
3. |
Imitation: This reflects an organization's seeking to minimize risk and maximize profit opportunities by copying the market leaders. |
![]() |
Innovators need the flexibility and free flowing information of the organic structure, whereas cost minimizers seek the efficiency, stability and tight controls of the mechanistic structure. |
![]() |
Imitators might use structural characteristics of both; mechanistic structure to maintain tight controls and low costs or the organic structure to mimic the industry,s innovative directions. |
![]() |
Size. |
![]() |
Large organizations tend to have more specialization, departmentalization, centralization, and rules and regulations than do small organizations. |
![]() |
But as organizations grow past a certain size, size has less influence on structure. |
![]() |
Technology. |
![]() |
Every organization use some form of technology to convert its inputs into outputs. |
![]() |
Organizations adapt their structures to their technology. |
![]() |
The process or methods that transform an organization's inputs into outputs differ by their degree of routines. |
![]() |
In general, the more routine the technology, the more mechanistic the structure can be. |
![]() |
Degree of Environmental Uncertainty. |
![]() |
Some organizations face relatively stable and simple environments, others face dynamic and complex environments. |
![]() |
Because uncertainty threatens an organization's effectiveness, managers will try to minimize it. |
![]() |
The greater the uncertainty, the more an organization needs the flexibility offered by an organic design. |
![]() |
In stable, simple environments, mechanistic designs tend to be most effective. |