1.3 Quality Gurus


To fully understand the TQM movement, we need to look at the philosophies of notable individuals who have
shaped the evolution of TQM. Their philosophies and teachings have contributed to our knowledge and
understanding of quality today. Their individual contributions are summarized in Table 1.2.

Table 1.2: Quality Gurus

1.3 Quality Gurus


Walter A. Shewhart
Was a statistician at Bell Labs during the 1920s and 1930s. Shewhart studied randomness and recognized
that variability existed in all manufacturing processes.
He developed quality control charts that are used to identify whether the variability in the process is random or
due to an assignable cause, such as poor workers or miscalibrated machinery.
He stressed that eliminating variability improves quality. His work created the foundation for today's statistical
process control, and he is often referred to as the "grandfather o quality control."

W. Edwards Deming
Is often referred to as the "father of quality control." He was a statistics professor at New York University in
the 1940s. After World War II he assisted many Japanese companies in improving quality.
The Japanese regarded him so highly that in 1951 they established the Deming Prize, an annual award given
to firms that demonstrate outstanding quality. It was almost 30 years later that American businesses began
adopting Deming's philosophy.
A number of elements of Deming's philosophy depart from traditional notions of quality. The first is the role
management should play in a company's quality improvement effort.

1.3 Quality Gurus


Historically, poor quality was blamed on workers-on their lack of productivity, laziness, or carelessness.
However, Deming pointed out that only 15 percent of quality problems are actually due to worker error.
The remaining 85 percent are caused by processes and systems, including poor management. Deming said
that it is up to management to correct system problems and create an environment that promotes quality and
enables workers to achieve their full potential.
He believed that managers should drive out any fear employees have of identifying quality problems, and that
numerical quotas should be eliminated. Proper methods should be taught and detecting and eliminating poor
quality should be everyone's responsibility.
Deming outlined his philosophy on quality in his famous "14 Points." These points are principles that help
guide companies in achieving quality improvement.
The principles are founded on the idea that upper management must develop a commitment to quality and
provide a system to support this commitment that involves all employees and suppliers.
Deming stressed that quality improvements cannot happen without organizational change that comes from
upper management.

1.3 Quality Gurus


Joseph M. Juran
After W. Edwards Deming, Dr. Joseph Juran is considered to have had the greatest impact on quality
management. Juran originally worked in the quality program at Western Electric.
He became better known in 1951, after the publication of his book Quality Control Handbook. In 1954 he went
to Japan to work with manufacturers and teach classes on quality.
Though his philosophy is similar to Deming's, there are some differences.
Whereas Deming stressed the need for an organizational "transformation," Juran believes that
implementing quality initiatives should not require such a dramatic change and that quality management
should be embedded in the organization.
One of Juran's significant contributions is his focus on the definition of quality and the cost of quality. Juran is
credited with defining quality as fitness for use rather than simply conformance to specifications.
As we have learned in this chapter, defining quality as fitness for use takes into account customer intentions
for use of the product, instead of only focusing on technical specifications.
Juran is also credited with developing the concept of cost of quality, which allows us to measure quality in
dollar terms rather than on the basis of subjective evaluations.

1.3 Quality Gurus


Juran is well known for originating the idea of the quality trilogy: quality planning, quality control, and quality
improvement.
The first part of the trilogy, quality planning, is necessary so that companies identify their customers, product
requirements, and overriding business goals.
Processes should be set up to ensure that the quality standards can be met.
The second part of the trilogy, quality control, stresses the regular use of statistical control methods to ensure
that quality standards are met and to identify variations from the standards.
The third part of the quality trilogy is quality improvement.
According to Juran, quality improvements should be continuous as well as breakthrough.
Together with Deming, Juran stressed that to implement continuous improvement workers need to have
training in proper methods on a regular basis.

1.3 Quality Gurus


Armand V. Feigenbaum
Another quality leader is Armand V. Feigenbaum, who introduced the concept of total quality control. In his
1961 book Total Quality Control.
In his 1961 book Total Quality Control, he outlined his quality principles in 40 steps.
Feigenbaum took a total system approach to quality.
He promoted the idea of a work environment where quality developments are integrated throughout the entire
organization, where management and employees have a total commitment to improve quality, and people
learn from each other's successes.
This philosophy was adapted by the Japanese and termed "company-wide quality control."

Philip B. Crosby
Is another recognized guru in the area of TQM. He worked in the area of quality for many years, first at Martin
Marietta and then, in the 1970s, as the vice president for quality at ITT.
He developed the phrase "Do it right the first time" and the notion of zero defects, arguing that no amount of
defects should be considered acceptable.

1.3 Quality Gurus


He scorned the idea that a small number of defects is a normal part of the operating process because
systems and workers are imperfect.
Instead, he stressed the idea of prevention.
To promote his concepts, Crosby wrote a book titled Quality Is Free, which was published in 1979.
He became famous for coining the phrase "quality is free" and for pointing out the many costs of quality,
which include not only the costs of wasted labor, equipment time, scrap, rework, and lost sales, but also
organizational costs that are hard to quantify.
Crosby stressed those efforts to improve quality more than pay for themselves because these costs are
prevented. Therefore, quality is free.
Like Deming and Juran, Crosby stressed the role of management in the quality improvement effort and the use
of statistical control tools in measuring and monitoring quality.

1.3 Quality Gurus


Kaoru Ishikawa
Is best known for the development of quality tools called cause-and-effect diagrams, also called fishbone or
Ishikawa diagrams.
These diagrams are used for quality problem solving.
He was the first quality guru to emphasize the importance of the "internal customer," the next person in the
production process.
He was also one of the first to stress the importance of total company quality control, rather than just focusing
on products and services.
Dr. Ishikawa believed that everyone in the company needed to be united with a shared vision and a common
goal.
He stressed that quality initiatives should be pursued at every level of the organization and that all employees
should be involved.
Dr. Ishikawa was a proponent of implementation of quality circles, which are small teams of employees that
volunteer to solve quality problems.

1.3 Quality Gurus


Genichi Taguchi
Is a Japanese quality expert known for his work in the area of product design. He estimates that as much as
80 percent of all defective items are caused by poor product design.
Taguchi stresses that companies should focus their quality efforts on the design stage, as it is much cheaper
and easier to make changes during the product design stage than later during the production process.
Taguchi is known for applying a concept called design of experiment to product design.
This method is an engineering approach that is based on developing robust design, a design that results in
products that can perform over a wide range of conditions.
Taguchi's philosophy is based on the idea that it is easier to design a product that can perform over a wide
range of environmental conditions than it is to control the environmental conditions.